Coming Soon

A Better Way to Evaluate AEC Technology

A place to find and evaluate software and AI solutions for the AEC industry — categorized by project phase and discipline, with honest reviews and verified integration data you can actually trust.

The current review landscape is broken

AEC firms making six- and seven-figure software decisions are relying on platforms riddled with pay-to-play rankings, AI-generated reviews, and vendor-funded visibility. The tools that appear at the top aren't necessarily the best — they're the ones that paid the most.

Meanwhile, the most critical information — whether integrations actually work, what implementation really looks like, and what the software costs after the sales pitch — is almost impossible to find.

~34% of reviews on major platforms estimated to be AI-generated
$87K per year for top-tier vendor packages on leading review sites
900+ undifferentiated listings in generic categories — unhelpful for specialized firms

Three ideas at the core

01

Reviewable Integrations

"We integrate with 200+ tools" means nothing if half of those integrations are shallow, broken, or one-directional. Our model is different: both sides of every integration verify that it exists and describe what it actually does. Then users can review the integration itself — not just the products on either end.

How it works: Vendor A and Vendor B each independently confirm and describe their integration. Users who have actually used the connection leave reviews on data flow, reliability, and limitations. You get a real picture instead of a checkbox on a features page.
02

Split Reviews: Product vs. Onboarding

In AEC, implementation cycles can stretch 12–18 months. A brilliant product with a painful onboarding experience is a very different proposition than one that's merely adequate but deploys in weeks. Every existing platform collapses these into a single score. We separate them.

What you'll see: Distinct ratings and written reviews for the product experience and the implementation/onboarding experience. We also plan to support ratings for implementation consultants — the firms you hire to help get software running.
03

Trust as a Foundation, Not a Feature

We're not building another platform that sells rankings to the highest bidder. There are no pay-for-placement schemes. Listings aren't boosted by spend. Reviews are verified. The directory exists to serve AEC firms making purchase decisions — not to extract revenue from vendors through visibility anxiety.

Our commitment: Verified reviewer identities, timestamped and version-tagged reviews, transparent methodology for any rankings or scores, and vendor responses displayed alongside criticism — not instead of it.

Details that matter in this industry

Generic software directories treat all industries the same. AEC has specific needs that deserve first-class treatment.

Organized by Workflow

Browse by project stage — preconstruction, design, construction, operations — not just generic software categories.

Role-Specific Views

A structural engineer, a GC project manager, and an architect have very different needs. Filter and view accordingly.

Security & Compliance

Our goal is to provide transparency in deployment model, data privacy posture, and compliance certifications — information that matters in AEC but is rarely easy to find.

Pricing Transparency

User-reported pricing data alongside official tiers, so you know what a tool actually costs — not just what the sales page says.

Every firm evaluating AEC tech

Whether you're a 5-person specialty trade contractor or a top-100 ENR firm, the goal is the same: find the right tools, avoid the wrong ones, and stop relying on vendor demos and Google searches to make critical technology decisions.

Architects Structural Engineers MEP Engineers General Contractors Estimators Project Managers Owners & Developers Subcontractors Facilities Managers Technology Directors

Help us build this right

We're in the early stages and talking to people across the industry before we go heads-down building. If you have thoughts, frustrations, or ideas about how AEC firms should be discovering and evaluating technology — we'd genuinely love to hear them.

Share Your Thoughts

Or reply to the email that brought you here — a one-line response is just as valuable as a detailed one.